## Thoughts on .077

21 posts
• Page

**2**of**2**• 1,**2**### Re: Thoughts on .077

markmark wrote:I had at first assumed the roman numberals stood for what order (...)

Shooting the panels is commutative : shooting A then B is the same as shooting B then A. So the order is irrelevant.

Ramond wrote:And how do you symbolize amounts?

OMG, now I see it . I assumed that the symbols could only mean 0, 1, 2 or 3 (as shooting a panel 4 times does nothing).

Actually, my solution was "there are 3 bars in XI, 3 in III ad 2 in VI, so i have to shoot the VIs twice and the III's and XI's thrice"

And it works because modulo 4, 11=3 and 6=2

vertigoelectric wrote:Sorry, but it stays.

I agree.

### Re: Thoughts on .077

jbaptistec wrote:markmark wrote:I had at first assumed the roman numberals stood for what order (...)

Shooting the panels is commutative : shooting A then B is the same as shooting B then A. So the order is irrelevant.

I'll assume this is merely bad communication. Allow me to elaborate... At first, as in in the beginning, as in initial sighting, as in before you even know what the symbols do because you just got here.

### Re: Thoughts on .077

**Spoiler!**:

To me it was quite obvious if you accually look carefully, you get the point

### Re: Thoughts on .077

Eye of the beholder but fair enough

### Re: Thoughts on .077

K0cc4 wrote:Spoiler!:

To me it was quite obvious if you accually look carefully, you get the point

I think this is a coincidence, though, because the larger numbers aren't like that.

21 posts
• Page

**2**of**2**• 1,**2**### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest